Documentary Growing 1981 Larry Rivers Download Link
Rating: 7/10 (for Art History enthusiasts), 4/10 (General Audience)
Growing Up in America is a moody, chaotic, and honest look at a specific slice of New York bohemia. It is a valuable document for those interested in Larry Rivers, the Pop Art movement, or No Wave Cinema. However, casual viewers looking for a straightforward biography or a history lesson will likely find it confusing and inaccessible.
Watch it if: You enjoy the films of Andy Warhol, Amos Poe, or the aesthetics of the Downtown 80s scene. Skip it if: You want a structured biography or high-production value.
The documentary (1981) is a 45-minute film by American artist Larry Rivers that chronicles the puberty of his two daughters, Emma and Gwynne, through footage shot at six-month intervals between 1976 and 1981. Originally intended for exhibition, the film was shelved for decades after Rivers’ wife, Clarice, intervened. It remains one of the most controversial works in modern art history, sparking intense debates over the boundaries between artistic expression and child exploitation.
Art vs. The Destruction of Innocence | - The Art | Crime Archive
The 1981 film by artist Larry Rivers is one of the most controversial works in modern art history. It is not available for public download, as it is currently at the center of intense legal and ethical disputes. Overview of "Growing" (1981) Documentary Growing 1981 Larry Rivers Download
Production: Between 1976 and 1981, Larry Rivers recorded footage of his two daughters at regular intervals over several years.
Content: The 45-minute edited work documents the physical and psychological changes the children experienced as they transitioned from childhood into adolescence.
Intent: The project was framed as an exploration of the passage of time and an attempt to challenge artistic and social boundaries regarding family documentation. Controversy and Legal Status
The work has remained largely inaccessible to the public due to significant opposition from family members and ethical concerns raised by cultural institutions.
Suppression: In 1981, the artist's wife intervened to prevent the film's inclusion in a planned exhibition, leading to the footage being archived. Rating: 7/10 (for Art History enthusiasts), 4/10 (General
Institutional Rejection: In 2010, New York University (NYU) declined to include the film and its raw footage in their acquisition of the artist's archives after reviewing the material.
Ongoing Dispute: The Larry Rivers Foundation currently manages the artist's estate. The subjects of the film have since spoken out against the work, describing the filming process as invasive and advocating for the destruction of the materials to prevent further distribution.
Ethical Debate: The film serves as a primary case study in the debate over the limits of artistic expression, the necessity of informed consent for children in art, and the potential long-term psychological impact on subjects. Related Media and Information
While the specific 1981 footage remains restricted, the life and legacy of the artist are discussed in other formats:
Larry Rivers: Bad Boy of the Art World (2023): A documentary by Barry Rosen that examines the artist's career within the Pop Art movement and the complexities of his personal life and family dynamics. Yes and no
Official Archives: Many of the artist's other works, which are not subject to these specific legal restrictions, are held at institutions such as the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) and the Smithsonian American Art Museum. AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more N.Y.U. Doesn't Want Film of Larry Rivers's Naked Daughters
Yes and no. If you find a torrent or a random .MP4 on a forum, it is likely a pirated VHS rip. However, there are legal acquisition methods that art professionals use.
The title Growing is deliberately ironic. While the film celebrates germination and expansion, it also acknowledges that all growth is followed by entropy. Rivers repeatedly cuts from vibrant seedlings to dying leaves, from a fresh canvas to a cluttered studio, from a child’s face to a weathered one. This duality reflects the artist’s lifelong engagement with mortality—his mother had died young, and his own body was beginning to show the wear of a hard-living artistic life.
Furthermore, Growing engages with a distinctly 1980s anxiety about technology and nature. As digital culture was beginning to emerge, Rivers’ hand-processed film stock and grainy textures stood as a defiantly analog meditation on organic process. The documentary implicitly argues that true growth—whether in a garden or in a work of art—cannot be accelerated or simulated; it requires time, decay, and patience.